Close

The Animal Welfare Act

Our work Animals in Aotearoa The Animal Welfare Act

New Zealand’s Animal Welfare Act

The Animal Welfare Act 1999 sets the foundation for animal care and protection in New Zealand. Internationally regarded as progressive for its recognition of animals as sentient beings, the Act is underpinned by the ‘Five Freedoms’ of animal welfare. 

The Animal Welfare Act sets out the obligations of animal owners and people in charge of animals, however whilst strong on paper, in practice the Act is undermined by loopholes and a lack of genuine enforcement. With significant gaps in oversight, monitoring, and implementation, the current system allows for animals to be the victims of severe cruelty, exploitation, and neglect. 

 

Support the call to improve this broken system

 

Sign the petition

Implementation & enforcement issues

The Animal Welfare Act and its supporting 'codes of welfare' are applied selectively with gaps in oversight, monitoring and enforcement. As a result of these inconsistencies, different industries are subject to different standards of care. Without independent oversight or accountability, the pursuit of productivity and profit often overrides the welfare of animals.

The Act is currently enforced by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) and the  SPCA. However both agencies lack sufficient resourcing to carry out effective animal welfare monitoring, resulting in chronic under-enforcement of the Act.

Conflict of interest issues

At the government level, animal welfare falls within the Minister of Agriculture’s portfolio, supported by an Associate Minister of Agriculture who holds direct responsibility for animal welfare policy. Under this structure, the same ministers tasked with driving productivity in the animal agriculture sector are also responsible for the welfare of the animals being exploited by those systems, creating an inherent conflict of interest.

Without unbiased or independent oversight, these conflicts of interest enable the welfare of animals to be overshadowed by the priorities of the trade and agriculture sectors.

Legal Challenges

In certain situations relating to grave, ongoing violations of the Animal Welfare Act we have the potential to explore legal action. SAFE has previously partnered with the New Zealand Animal Law Association (NZALA) to take the government to court over farrowing crates and rodeos, seeking legal justice for animals.

 

Farrowing crates ban

 

Farrowing crates are barbaric cages where mother pigs are confined from a few days before giving birth and until their babies are taken away up to five weeks afterwards. In 2019, SAFE and NZALA challenged the use of farrowing crates in court on the basis that the regulations and minimum standards which allowed for their use were unlawful under the Animal Welfare Act.  

In November 2020 the High Court ruled the Minister of Agriculture and the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) acted illegally when they failed to phase out the use of farrowing crates for mother pigs. This was the first time a Code of Welfare had been challenged in court. 

You can find out more about this campaign and the High Court case here. 

 

Rodeo challenged in court

 

In July 2022, SAFE and NZALA jointly contested rodeo in the High Court.  

During those legal proceedings, it emerged that the publishing of the 2018 Rodeo Code of Welfare had not adhered to due process. This suggested shortcomings with how the rodeo code was developed, highlighting again the broader issues associated with the development of codes of welfare. The High Court did not make a ruling on the legality of rodeo, instead indicating the correct process for challenging this matter would be during NAWAC’s consultation process for the revised Rodeo Code of Welfare.  

SAFE continues to campaign for an end to rodeo. Watch this space for campaign updates and information on the upcoming code of welfare consultation process.

Support the call for an independent voice for animals

The issues associated with the implementation of the Animal Welfare Act require authentic and meaningful solutions.

Animal protection organisations from across the country have formed an alliance calling for an independent representation for animals at parliamentary level; the Commissioner for Animals Alliance.

Join us in calling for independent representation for animals. Together we can build a future where animal welfare is genuinely prioritised and the Animal Welfare Act is upheld.

FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

New Zealand’s Animal Welfare Act is legislation that sets out the obligations of animal owners or people in charge of animals.  

The two key areas of focus of the Animal Welfare Act are: 
  1. Care of animals  
  2. Conduct towards animals  
 The framework of the Animal Welfare Act includes:  
  • Establishing a duty of care for animals
  • Setting out the obligations of animal owners or people in charge of animals; they are required to meet an animal’s physical, health, and behavioural needs, and must alleviate pain or distress.
  • Provisions to prevent ill treatment and inadequate care of animals. 

Originally enacted in 1999 the Act is updated through amendments as needed. For example: 

  • 2015 – updated to recognise animals as sentient beings 
  • 2015 – updated to incorporate the ban on animal testing for cosmetic products and ingredients
  • 2022updated to incorporate the ban on live animal exports 
The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is the government agency responsible for administering the Animal Welfare Act. MPI, the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA), and the New Zealand Police all hold enforcement powers under the Act. In practice, enforcement is carried out primarily by MPI and the SPCA, each of which employs teams of animal welfare inspectors.
  • MPI receives and acts upon concerns involving sheep, pigs, cattle and other large animals, as well as emus, ostriches, and hens and chickens outside urban areas.
  • SPCA receives and acts upon concerns involving small companion animals, most birds, hens and chickens in urban areas, and cases of cruelty to pets.

 

Enforcement options available to both MPI and SPCA include:  

  • Education  
  • Warnings  
  • Enforcement orders  
  • Infringement notices  
  • Prosecution 

Sentience means animals can experience emotions, feelings, perceptions, and sensations that matter to them — from negative states like pain or boredom to positive ones such as pleasure or comfort.

The Five Freedoms is an internationally recognised framework defining the core conditions animals need to experience good welfare.

The Five Freedoms of animal welfare are:  

  1. Freedom from hunger and thirst
    Access to fresh water and a diet that maintains full health
  2. Freedom from discomfort
    An appropriate environment, including shelter and a comfortable resting area
  3. Freedom from pain, injury, and disease
    Prevention or rapid diagnosis and treatment
  4. Freedom to express normal behaviour
    Sufficient space, suitable facilities, and the company of animals of their own kind
  5. Freedom from fear and distress
    Conditions and treatment that avoid mental suffering

The Animal Welfare Act itself does not provide detailed requirements, instead these are outlined in supporting codes and regulations:  

Codes of welfare

Developed by the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC), codes of welfare set minimum standards and recommended best practice. They provide guidance on how to comply with the Animal Welfare Act, and failure to meet a minimum standard in a code may be used as evidence to support a prosecution.

Regulations

The Animal Welfare (Care and Procedures) Regulations 2018 are developed by MPI and enable enforcement of low to medium level animal welfare offending. They also specify who may perform certain surgical procedures and how these procedures must be carried out. Most regulations carry an associated penalty.

  • Two committees – the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) and the National Animal Ethics Advisory Committee (NAEAC) – were established to advise the government on animal welfare. However both bodies are purely advisory, and ministers are under no obligation to adopt or act on their recommendations.

 

  • NAWAC develops codes of welfare that outline minimum standards and best‑practice guidance for different species and activities. Yet loopholes and ambiguities within these codes can allow practices that undermine the intent and principles of the Animal Welfare Act.

 

  • Enforcement capacity is also severely limited. MPI and the SPCA lack the resources needed to monitor animal welfare nationwide, leading to highly selective enforcement. MPI, for example, has 43 animal welfare inspectors responsible for overseeing the welfare of more than 160 million farmed animals.

 

  • As a result, prosecutions for animal welfare offences are rare. With both MPI and SPCA operating under significant resource constraints, only the most extreme cases typically progress to legal action.

 

  • Government funding allocated to animal welfare is minimal. Enforcement therefore frequently relies on public reporting and the work of charities to hold people accountable for cruelty and neglect.
  • Animal welfare currently sits within the Minister of Agriculture’s portfolio. The Minister’s core role is to ‘support the New Zealand food and fibre sector to be productive and prosperous’ and ‘advance New Zealand’s agriculture and export opportunities’. This creates an inherent conflict between promoting agricultural production and safeguarding the animals used within those systems.

 

  • The current Associate Minister for Agriculture with oversight of animal welfare is ACT MP Andrew Hoggard – a lifelong dairy farmer, former president of Federated Farmers and board member of the International Dairy Federation. Minister Hoggard is not an animal welfare expert, and his track record shows a clear bias toward industry rather than the welfare of animals (notable examples include his decision to reinstate the ban on live animal exports by sea, ignoring a High Court ruling to ban farrowing crates, and his outspoken support for rodeo).. In November 2025 SAFE laid a formal complaint against Minister Hoggard and called for the animal welfare portfolio to be reassigned. You can find out more here.

 

  • MPI, which ‘operates across the whole supply chain of primary production’ is also charged with administering the Animal Welfare Act. This dual role means that the same agency responsible for promoting agricultural industries is also tasked with regulating them – a structural conflict that enables industry interests to shape animal‑welfare policy.

 

  • Animal‑entertainment industries such as horse and greyhound racing largely self‑regulate, with minimal external oversight. MPI and the SPCA have limited jurisdiction over these sectors, leaving the welfare of racing animals largely in the hands of the industries themselves.

 

  • The two advisory bodies created under the Act – the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) and the National Animal Ethics Advisory Committee (NAEAC) – are not fully independent. NAWAC, in particular, is heavily populated by farmers, veterinarians, and individuals involved in animal‑use industries rather than experts in animal ethics, welfare science, law, or policy.

 

  • NAWAC is also not held accountable for delays in its work programme or in the development and updating of codes of welfare. As a result, outdated or incomplete codes remain in place for years, leaving many animals vulnerable to ongoing exploitation and neglect.

If you suspect a breach of the Animal Welfare Act or its minimum standards within the codes of welfare, you can report the matter through the following channels:

  • For farmed animals
    Report the issue to MPI by calling 0800 00 83 33 or by submitting a report through MPI’s online complaint form
  • For companion animals
    Contact your local SPCA centre for assistance and to report concerns
Donate today

Animals are being failed by a broken system - You can change that

Please give generously this Christmas, so that we can advocate for a Commissioner for Animals and create the strong, independent oversight that is missing from our animal welfare system. Your compassion can transform the future for every animal who is suffering right now.